Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Week 7 Exercises

Part 1: Chaos

In this part of the exercise, we are going to investigate the obrbit of a zero-mass particle in a Sun-Jupiter system. The Week 2 exercise on the restricted three-body problem may be useful as a starting point. Here we approximate the mass of Jupiter to be μ2=GM=103\mu_2 = \mathcal{G}M = 10^{-3}, so that the semi-major axis of Jupiter orbit is a=1a =1. While Jupiter’s orbit is known to be slightly eccentric, here we assume e=0e=0.

Note: In the following notations, xx, yy, x˙\dot{x}, and y˙\dot{y} are quantities in the rotating frame of Sun-JUpiter system. REBOUND takes intital conditions in initial frame. Use Murray Eqn. (3.10) & Eqn. (3.11) to transform. And if you wan to transform back to rotating frame, which you will need in egenerating surface section plot, consult with Eqn.(3.30) & Eqn.(3.31). As you can see in (1), initial conditions matters to the orbital evolution.

Hint: In REBOUND, sim.move_to_com() function allow you to move to the centre of mass frame. After defining the Sun-Jupiter system and before defining the particles, using this function makes the analysis easier.

  1. Orbits are sensitive to initial conditions. Now place 2 particles with the same semi-major axis (a0=0.8a_0 = 0.8), eccentricity (e0=0.4e_0 = 0.4) and longitude of pericentre (ωˉ=295\bar{\omega} = 295^\circ) but with slightly different initial mean longitudes (θ=293\theta = 293^\circ and θ=293.5\theta = 293.5^\circ). Run the simulation for 1 period of Jupiter’s orbit. Can you see the deviation?

  2. Set 2 particles with different locations x0=0.55x_0 = 0.55 and x0=0.56x_0 = 0.56. Both with y0=0y0 = 0 and x0˙=0\dot{x_0} = 0, with y˙>0\dot{y} > 0 determined from the solution of Murray & Dermott Eq. (9.5) with CJ = 3.07. Run simulation for long time (~300 Jupiter orbits). Can you spot the difference between a regular orbit and a chaotic orbit? Plot aa and ee with time. Compare the result with Fig. 9.4 and 9.6 in Murray.

  3. Once you manage to find a regular orbit and a chaotic orbit, now place 1 more particle at each initial location with tiny separation (Δx0105\Delta x_0 \sim 10^{-5}) from the particle already there. Plot aa of the 2 particles at the same location, after how many orbit periods can you see the divergence?

  4. Plot the maximum Lyapounov characteristic exponent γ\gamma where

    di=d0exp γ(tit0)d_i = d_0 \exp~\gamma(t_i - t_0)

    in which did_i is the seperation in phase space at time tit_i. Can you see the difference between a regular orbit and a chaotic orbit?

  5. Plot the surface of section for the trajectory of all 4 particles whenever y=0y = 0 with y˙>0\dot{y} > 0. Compare to the plot as shown in Murray Fig. 9.5 and Fig. 9.7. Is the shape as expected as being close to a resonance orbit?

  6. Investigate the relation between the number of “islands” displayed in the surface section plot and resonance ratio.

  7. Choose a different orbital resonance ratio from Fig. 9.16 for each group and run the simulations. Plot the surface section as in (5). Upload your xx, x˙\dot{x} here. Let’s make a big plot togather! (Hint: Remember that the surface section plot gives you position and velocity in rotaing frame! Look into the graph to find your initial x0x_0 and y0y_0.)